I thought I saw her wear this dress before…Meagan Good is one celebrity who is always recycling goods, as she did last week when she wore this floral tight dress to the Beckham party. She first showed it off back in 2003 at the 1st Annual Vibe Awards…and she wore it in 2005, but lets not keep a count.
When did she rock it better? Though she looks a tad thicker now, she’s still working that dress til the last thread!
Damn Meagan Goode is a Broke Broke…
damn even I dont wear shit from 2003..WTF i look like
BTW PRIMERO!!!!!!!
i think pic 2 her hair looks better and the dress looks better too
pic 2 which one is from when?
wait a damn minute she done got fat?
*edited the pics, sorry about that
She looks better in Pic1, mainly because of the hair and shoes.
I bet if you ask all the guys…they will say she looks better in pic 1 …pic 2 loks like a 14 y/o hoodrat playing dress up…pic 1 her body looks better, the shoes look better, her skin looks better
the hair looks healthy..not like a 99 cent store barrel bin weave like in the 2nd pic
LMAO @ #1′s comment
ROFL @7, good critique!
in 2003 The 2nd pic. A thad ticker lol sorry dont think so . Anyways I like her thinner much better.
She is a tad thicker, ain’t like she fat! She a good thick, ya know?
In 03, she was movie star thin, wearing push up bras. Now she probably don’t need them.
I must say she rocked it better in 2003. That dress looks better on a thinner figure & she looks a little to thick to wear it now.
[IMG]http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u214/audramcbride21_2007/18.jpg[/IMG]
Thanks Ti, oh girl I’m loving the hair, work it work it!
I personally think her slim is a better look. her thickness ain’t as cute. It’s okay to be thick, but some people just ain’t meant to be…that’s like lookin at kelly rowland thick. Eew
mayb i jus don’t like the dress or the shoes…
but from the neck up i prefer 2007 (fresh face & good weave/wig)
neck down 2003 (dress is more flattering on petite shape)
but either way i love her…those lips, her acting (& independent producing)…the girl is on fire
@ Tianna
ok you are right its not like she is to fat, but she chubby a litlle to much to the point were it isnt cute . Like some one said some people can handle extra fat and some just cant rock it .
I LIKE THAT GROWNWOMAN THICKNESS IN ’07! CAN’T WAITE FOR THE FLICK SHE’S DOING WHERE SHE’S A LESBIAN HOOKER, VERY DIFFERENT!
2003! Back in the day old school Megan was the shiz lol
She looks very sexy in the second pic where she has straight hair. But she looks voluptious in the first pic. She’s hot on both.
i think she rocked in 2003 and 2007 but she has more curves in 2007
2003 wore it better, hair and shoes were cute with the outfit
she rocked it better in 2007. Why because from her make-up to her curves…she looks better!
my bad i know the pic with the one she has the curly hair is the 2005 pic n that looks better, thats the one pic i chose in the first place. but you can tell thats its most recent cuz one the quality of the pic n two she is thicker on that pic. i think she looks much better thicker than being smaller. but she has to be careful being a celebrity and all gaining weight.
I think she rocked it better on the 03 pic. Her added weight is givin the dress a “grandma” effect.
@#7. I don’t see anything “hoodrat” about her at all. I just don’t see the correlation.
2003!!!!
I actually prefer pic 2. She looks much more sophisticated ( I really don’t see the “hoodrat” thing either, I don’t know wtf #7 is talking about) and the dress fits better.
There’s a sultry look to the way she holds herself and it’s quite sexy.
The shoes of pic 1 would have worked better though…
07 off top. She looks like a grown woman in 07 but a hood rat trying to look cute in 03.
I can’t wait to see her New Movie either b/c for the first time we will see her play a different role. i hope she steps her game up b/c she needs help with her acting.
What, no poll?
She looks better in this dress in the 2nd pic. She looks a little disheveled in the first pic, like she just ran out the house, and the dress doesn’t fit as well. In 2003 she looked much more polished and put together.
@ dahlia
I was thinking the exact same thing about the shoes and she doesnt look like a hoodrat .
DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT THE NAME OF THE FLICK SHE’S DOING PLAYING A LESBIAN???
1 wins hands down. Thick and foiiine! The ways I likes it.
I like the Second Pic, but she did get a lot thicker….but I mean I dont knock her…
I mean if she broke, she broke from not doing any movies or shows…Two times is acceptable but three and four times is A HELL NAW!!!!
I think the pic number 1 cause she got her grown and sexy thang going on. On pic 2 she looks like a little girl.
i know she has gained weight, but something ain’t quite right about her in the face. starting to look a little lil kim-ish.
SHE LOOKS BETTER IN PIC 2, HOW CAN SHE FIND A DRESS SHE WORE IN 2003 WOW!
She is looking a bit chunky in 2007, but she keeps it real not everyone gets clothes for free in Hollyhood, so sometimes to keep money flowing you have to recycle. I am not mad at Ms. Good. No one retired on clothing, stocks and bonds baby, keep the money where it belongs in the bank instead of the hands of already super rich designers, we should be applauding her not making fun of her. Shit if it fits keep it in the mix.!
You know why she is a little thicker because she is getting a lot of the male appendages now
The 2003 pic most def. The dress is more flattering on a patite figure.
SHE LOOKS BETTER 2 ME IN THE 2ND PIC WITH THE STRIGHT HAIR, SO SIMPLE, YET CHIC, SHE ALSO LOOKS GOOD WITH THE XTRA CAKES, LOL
she luk sxc in both but in dat perticular dress she lukz bettah in 2003
People this is not the same dress, look at it carefully
2007 pic: she looks like she’s wearing a fat suit. That dress is designed for a skinny woman, or her in 2003. I like her hair, shoes, and jewelry better in the 2007 dress. She looks funny because she gained too much weight in the waist.
the dress is ugly 1st of all. I think she rocked it better in 2003. Her hair fits better in the 2007 pic though.
yea, i think she rocked it betta w/her slimmer look. the thickness doesn’t look too good on her. not everyone can pull off “THICK”. lol
she looks ok in both, but a bit fuller in pic one. I love her hair in pic1, and love her shoes in pic2
LMAO@#46 that not every one can pull off “THICK”. so true.lol
Iono, the shoes were way better in ’07, but i like the ’03 look 2, minus the prom shoes of course.
On second thought maybe the 1st pic looks better, I didn’t even notice the weight difference till I read the other comments. She’s not fat, but a lil chubby in the midsection which makes the dress look ill-fitted.
The dress is tacky 1st of all… and 4 years difference she gained weight… her hips got WIDER, and she has chub in da face….
pic 1 looks better, she fills out the dress more. can’t wear a tight dress if you can’t fill it out!
well at least she can still fit the d@mn thing! LOL
Damn Meagan is a lil thicky thick on the first pic!
I ain’t mad Meagan recycle ur goods lol I think she rocked it better in the recent picture tho!
Lmao at # 1 wow that is crazy she needs to work huh. I like the 1st pic better.
In 2003 is when she rocked it better. In the first pic she looks like she is about to bust out of the dress. Poor Megan…
2nd pic, she gain mad weight since then
Megan looks pregnant to me. That dress is atrocious. She should burn it immediately.
she has put on some serious weight
i like 2007′s pic better.