POLITICS: OH DEMOCRATIC DEBATE RECAP
Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama debated in Ohio Tuesday evening for the last time before key primaries in the state along with Texas, Rhode Island and Vermont on March 4.
Political analysts (and even her husband) say that Clinton must win Texas and Ohio if she hopes to continue vying for the nomination.
As mentioned last week, Rasmussen Reports show Clinton leading in both states; however, Obama is gaining ground in Ohio and Clinton is leading in Texas by a single percentage point.
Tuesday’s debate offered Clinton the chance to clear the air regarding claims that her opponent mischaracterized her stances on health care and NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, which eliminated a majority of tariffs on products traded among the United States, Canada and Mexico.
“I have a great deal of respect for Sen. Obama, but we have differences,” she said. “In the last several days, some of those differences in tactics and choices that Sen. Obama’s campaign has made regarding fliers and mailers and other information that has been put out … have been very disturbing to me.”
She said her health plan would cover everyone and be affordable to everyone. She also mentioned NAFTA’s benefit to the economy in some parts of the U.S., but added that she has always felt that it needs to be improved in order to provide better labor and environmental protections in Canada and Mexico.

On Tuesday, the front page of the New York Post included a photo of Sen. Obama clad in Muslim attire.
The Drudge Report posted the photo Monday and claimed to have received an e-mail written by a Clinton staffer griping that if such an image had been taken of the New York senator, she would have been mocked.
Experts say that the photo likely won’t have any negative on Obama, but could damage Clinton.
During the debate, Clinton denied knowledge of the photograph of Obama in Somali tribal attire taken during Obama’s 2006 visit to Africa coming from one of her staff.
“So far as I know, it did not. That’s not the kind of behavior that I condone or expect from the people working in my campaign.”
Obama said he believes her. “I take Sen. Clinton at her word that she knows nothing about the photo,” he said.
Also, earlier this week, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan endorsed Obama.
“This young man is the hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better,” he said. “This young man is capturing audiences of black and brown and red and yellow. If you look at Barack Obama’s audiences and look at the effect of his words, those people are being transformed.”
At the debate, Clinton criticized Obama for not explicitly rejecting support of Farrakhan.
“There’s a difference between denouncing and rejecting,” Clinton said. “And I think when it comes to this sort of, you know, inflammatory — I have no doubt that everything that Barack just said is absolutely sincere. But I just think, we’ve got to be even stronger. We cannot let anyone in any way say these things because of the implications that they have, which can be so far reaching.”
Other media outlets have reported that Obama’s church, Trinity United Church of Christ, and its minister, Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., have ties to the Nation of Islam and its leader. Last year, Farrakhan received the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Lifetime Achievement Trumpeteer Award at the 2007 Trumpet Gala and was the cover story of the November/December 2007 issue of the Trinity United Church of Christ’s magazine, Trumpet.
Obama denounced statements that he accepted Farrakhan’s endorsement.
“I obviously can’t censor him, but it is not support that I sought,” Obama said. “And we’re not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with Minister Farrakhan.”
Obama added, “I can’t say to somebody that he can’t say that he thinks I’m a good guy” and that he didn’t “see a difference between ‘denouncing’ and ‘rejecting’.”








111 Comments
COMMENT PAGES: « 1 [2] Show All
76.
Sharonda
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
LOL, like Hilary supporters haven’t done “dirt.” I refuse to believe, feminist kill me sometimes.The reason why people are leaning toward Obama because he has a positive outlook and not so stern, unapproachable, and mean mugging looking.And most liberals and independents are for him.Your facial expressions (not color) is everything (look what happen to that guy who was screaming literally on the top of his lungs,I can’t remember his name).Reason why people leaning toward Clinton because of Bill.The reason for McCain because he is an old dude with old traditions.
McCain might have a chance though , but putting a Republican back in the house is the last thing on my mind.McCain is old as hell.I’m going for Obama.Obama and McCain are the top choices.
DO YOUR RESEARCH.It seems that some of you haven’t.
77.
Justice66
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
Approachable, nice, and unstren looks aren’t going to deter/prevent the next terrorist attack. Obama’s “style” is a better fit for Charimanship of the United Nations, NOT President of the US at a time of war.
78.
Ninagirl1
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
1
79.
Ninagirl1
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
Barack Obama a.k.a. The Rockstarr of Politics
80.
flylike
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
if Republicans had a “plan” to set Obama up, i think its really stupid to choose him.
They shoulda chose to go against Hillary if they wanted to win
for
1 )- Republicans hate her so those who don’t like McCain or the direction of the republican party would still ensure they go out to vote against her. As compared to Obama whom alot of Republicans happen to like and would vote for . Theres no real HATE for Obama except around these inconsequential bigots who no one give a fuck about anyway..
2) Independents sway over to Obama also , so you’re gonna lose independent votes if Obama is the candidate.
3) Obama supporters are fanatics, and they especially dont like Hillary so some of em would prolly go over to Reps if Hillary were the candidate.
4) The pt is Hillary divides the country, and that divide would only benefit the Republicans…esp if she divides the Democratic party.
5) unless they have some major shit to bury Obama with, he would easily win the Presidency, unless Nader throws a monkey wrench in and steals the votes. McCain will probably out himself also, he says a whole lotta bullshit, im sure he will put his foot in his mouth over and over again, and the republican campaign seems clueless ..same as the Clinton campign. In my opinion the Clinton’s are usually best at campaigning and if Obama can beat them he can beat anybody.
6) Check the polls http://www.cnn.com/2008/P...schneider.poll/index.html and see who Republicans feel is harder for McCain to beat, they overwhelmingly prefer to have Hillary, so this “plan” is not shared by the vast majority of Republicans
“The USA Today-Gallup poll asked Republicans which Democrat would McCain have a better chance of beating.
The answer: Clinton 66 percent, Obama 18 percent.”
And i mean seriously if McCain were to beat Obama, i’m moving to Canada..
81.
Onemil02
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
@80
You answered your own question, THEY HATE HER. They want none of her, and these polls say one thing now, but since you want to throw polls out there, the new ones show McCain beating both Hillary and Obama. Those things change with the win anyways, especially with there being like 100s out there. And another interesting poll I just read showed where Hillary has a 41 point lead against Obama with Registered Latino voters in Texas. 62%- to 21%. Now if that is true, how in the world are they neck and neck in Texas. Cause he doesn’t cut into the Latino vote in Texas which makes up almost 40% of the Democratic vote I don’t see no way in hell how it will be neck and neck. But my point is, forget the polls, cause they can be accurate but misleading sometimes. We all just have to see what goes down next week in Texas.
Side Note: Independents are voting for him in the Primaries, but that does not mean they will vote for him in the General election, it’s a whole different ball field then.
82.
Laquisha
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
OOBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
83.
flylike
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
so onemil02 , they hate her because they are scared she can beat him? No, they hate her because they HATE her.
If she were the presidential candidate i GUARANTEE that the Republicans would win.
Also yes he’s beating him 44% 42% , but statistically its a Tie….and i don’t trust any poll but i trust Gallop, and im watchin it right now on CNN…Obama is in good position.
Don’t quite care about Latinos in Texas and all that, the democratic party seems to already know their nominee its just a matter of time
the focus is beating McCain…
and i still dont get ur pt on them hating her so they are scared of going up against her…quite silly..THEY HATE HER SO THEY WOULD ENSURE SHE LOSES…
with Obama republicans would stay home with Hillary those fools are out there voting by any mean necessary
84.
Lori
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
Hillary really needs to stop playing these dirty little games, they’re going to come back and bite her in the ass!
85.
TASHA IN TX
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
#13 Bush scared Americans with “Weapons on Mass Destruction. People were not voting for him because he was so great but out of fear of terrorism.
OBAMA will win this election
YES WE CAN !!!!
86.
Onemil02
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
@83
The Republicans are scared of her cause she will go toe to toe with them and won’t back down from what she think is right and what she stands for. Obama from what I have see caves in or just want peace so he won’t fight for something even if he knows its right. His 130 or so present votes showed me that.
As far as Latinos, you need to care about them cause for any Democrat to win the general election, they have to win California. If come next Tuesday, the Latinos in Texas overly vote for Hillary Clinton, that is a problem for Obama. He is not connecting with them and will need them in the general election. Also in New York and Florida. And both California and Florida have Republicans Governors that will go to bat for John McCain and they are both popular in their states. SO HE NEED LATINOS, you better believe that.
I am looking at the bigger picture. Like almost all the states he has won during this democratic primary/caucus season have been and always will be red states in the general election (if you think Utah, Idaho, Kansas, and etc are going to go to Barack in the general election you smoking). Back in the 04 election the polls had John Kerry beating Bush by even bigger margins during the nomination season (like 15-20%) and with the way Bush was running this country into the ground, we all were sure no one would vote him back in, and look at what happen. Kerry was a weak candidate and so will Obama be. Clinton is the only one to take them on, they know it and that’s why they want her out so they can pick Obama’s apart.
87.
Onemil02
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
another point flylike
Them conservative republicans are not about to sit at home and let a very Extra Liberal half black democratic candidate take the white house. I live in the south, and that is not about to happen. Some of the Obama supporters are not realistic at all. Read this article below and is basically sums up what I been saying for months.
http://www.realclearpolit...y_rules_keep_clinton.html
88.
james
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
I think Senator Clinton is beginning to show signs of frustration, and rightfully so. Less than 1 year ago, she was the favorite to win the Democratic nomination. What happened? Someone talked a very charismatic, but less qualified, candidate to run against her. She is more qualified to lead our nation, but losing because of her personality. However, personality alone cannot lead a nation. Experience on a national and international level are also required. As previously stated, if they both were men, or both women, or if she were a white man and Senator Obama a black woman, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. She has been set up and torn down by her own party, betrayed by people she considered friends and supporters, wrongly painted as a racist, and has received unfair treatment by the media, especially by the hosts of the political shows. Once the media has turned against you, there’s nothing you can do. A Clinton/Obama ticket would have been a “sure thing.” If Senator Clinton is not on the Democratic ticket in 2008, The Democrats will not win. The Republicans will jump on Senator Obama’s lack of experience, and if there is any dirt, scandal or skeletons to find in his closet, the media outlets will work overtime to reveal all of them to us.
89.
Tonya
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
I was watching CNN today after work and all they did was try to link Obama to Farrakhan, the media will definately side with McCain in the general election and Obama supporters need to realize this.
Don’t believe half of the sh*& you read on MSNBC, CNN, FOX, or ABC News b/c they are biased against democratics and they love McCain. I try to get my information from Tavis, PBS, CBS, 60 minutes and democratic blogs like CROOKSANDLIARS, TALKINGPOINTSMEMO, AMERICABLOG, AND DRLAMONTHILL…. the pro democratic blogs let you know what is really going on!
90.
Ty
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
@#70
You right thats just how its all going tro come out. I’m not biased for Hillary or Barack a democrat is democrat, whether they are calm and smooth in public or angry and disgruntled. A month ago Barack was behind double digits in some polls, so do we really think he said something from then to now, that has just jumped him way out there, the republicans want him to win. If he gets the nod than the press are gonna start negative about him too, the only reason it hasnt started is because no one wants to seem like the racist type, all thanks to Bill Clinton big mouth. Do we really think that most white people don’t want a white woman president but would like a black president, lol thats funny times havent changed that much yet. I just hope most black people are voting for Barack because they understand where he is going and like his policies, than the fact that well he’s black he got my vote.
91.
flylike
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
Onemil02 first off that article is incredibly biased and is obviously Pro-Clinton, so im good on that
I do kno the Latino vote matters but im pretty sure she will not win by such a large margin if she wins at all..
Do you know why Obama isn’t connecting with them? because latinos are racist against blacks…it has nothing to do with what hes about. and its not like he has no latino support
The reason they are voting for hillary is cuz of Bill, i honestly dont know what the clintons have done for latinos for them to be such staunch supporters…they are voting off of familiarity and race…
theyd trust a white man anyday over a blk man…
i still dont get how Hillary is tougher for Reps, your arguments r going over my head or maybe ur not stating it clearly, she cannot handle pressure, look how silly shes been actin on this campaign, when shes next to Obama shes all lovey dovey, when shes on the campaign trail its war. She is constantly whining and making a fool or herself, she has turned off democrats in much the same way Reps are turned off by her.
And they are less turned off by Obama, he is dynamic enough a candidate to garner support easily for the coming elections. Like i said they need something big to pin him with, Those little stupid things they throw at him are all weak, that man is way too smart to play into their games. i.e that alQaeda in Irag b.s
Unless they can find pictures with Obama in a underground hole with Osama somewhere i dont see how theyre gonna beat him. Black as he is and im not naiive, but Obama is a force to be reckoned with for General Elections….he would kill the reps with swing votes
I bet u Dems are praying he wins so they can have him on the ballot, the only way hillary can win the G.E is if Obama is VP…other than that shes dooomed…
if u think Reps will pick him apart shit what will they do to her? Obama has barely come at her and shes already falling apart, and her campaign is delusional.
and please no Obama Kerry comparisons. please..
92.
A Beautiful Lie
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
@ 53
Wow crip talk… I applaud you for that intelligently written post. NOT!!
He was right to denounce Farrakhan’s statement. That dude has a terrorist mentality… only differance is he’s not blowin shit up.
93.
Onemil02
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
@91
I am not about to go through another big explanation. If he gets the nod, you will just see for yourself how it all plays out. 2004/2008 basically same, democrats having their weakest nominee that will lose.
94.
5 dollas and 45 cents
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
i do have a question tho..but its coming from me.
do yall think that the world is ready for a “black president” either or a “woman for president”?…do you think as soon as either one becomes president that one will get asassinated?…. i dont know if asassination is over and done with but its a question. This is some new swirl thats being brought to the world, so again are we ready for it?
95.
The King of Meats
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
—————–When the Republicans try to attact Obamas experience…he’s just going
—————–to remind the American people of the tens of thousands of men and
—————–women who have been maimed, crippled, battered, deformed, mutilated
—————–or killed in the war started by Bush and McCain! He will also speak
—————–about what their experience has done for the economy! He will explain
—————–to the American people how the elitist attitude has destroyed our
—————–credibility and influence around the world! He has so ammunition to
—————–debate with the Republicans…it will only further his cause! Plus, anyone
—————–with half a brain will know that his knowledge of the Muslim world will
—————–make him a more effective diplomat in foreign affairs. Hillary know she
—————–blew it when she PMS’ed with her, “Meet me in Ohio for a debate” plead!
96.
The King of Meats
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
——————-How can you say that Farrakhan has a terrorist mentality…when he
——————-has never terrorised anyone! His anti-semitic garbage is no worst than
——————-that of Don Imus or Krammer calling black people…nappy headed N…!
——————-And, most people who know history understand where he’s coming from!
——————-Yes, his hate message is wrong, but he has done very little to set the
——————-Jewish back! He couldn’t touch them if his life depended on it!
——————-Now, on the one matter connecting Obama’s church with Farrakhan…!
——————-That was nothing more than his “old pastor” acknowledging the work
——————-that they do in the prisons. Surely, your pastor does some questionable
——————-things too. Especially, in places like Chicago, Philly, New York & Mich.
——————-Some of those old pastors have taken money from the Nation & Masons
——————-That’s why God gives us a spirit of discernment…so we can sort the ish!
97.
PROVOST...
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
I AM IN LOVE WITH J. DAKAR:
Why so defensive, lol? All I said was “IF those are the views you espouse…”
If it’s of any reassurance to my humility, “Provost” is simply a nickname given to me by my peers, the Men of Morehouse College. My kindergarten teacher also used to call me “Professor,” by the way. ::shrug/sigh:: I must say though, I thought everyone on here was too grown to still have the “beat up the smart kid” mentality. You know, you TOO can have an academic nickname. Maybe Dean, or even Department Chair. I’ll support your decision either way.
98.
Wack Music
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
I liked Bill Clinton as a president but didn’t he that same approach with Kim Jong II and N. Korea that Obama is trying to say he will take with N. Korea and the rest of the world. It’s extremely naive.
Learn from your mistakes people. N. Korea just took advantage of him and the U.S. and didn’t bother even complying with U.S. regulations. Bill attempting to normalize diplomatic relations with N. Korea and even offered aide to N. Korea. Meanwhile Kim Jong II was producing weapons grade plutonium and secretly tryin gto enrich uranium. I think in foreign policy Obama is extremely naive to the reality of the world and obviously has not learned from Clinton’s mistakes. However, I think Bill learned from his mistakes and realized it just doesn’t work like that in the real world no matter how much you want to ‘change’ and negotatiate with adversaries.
I believe Hillary also learned a lot from Bill’s mistakes evidenced by her responses in debates that she would only met and negotiate with preconditions and some leaders are not worth meeting with given their history and the history of those particular countries. Obama is just naive about domestic and foreign policy and in particular how to deal with U.S. adversaries. To me that is a clear indication that he is not ready to be president and that Hillary and McCain (seriously) are more prepared to be president. But then you know Americans never seem to learn from their mistakes or past history. For some odd reason people believe Obama can wave a magic wand over the world and everyone will sing Kumbya and be happy. This reality is Obama is not running for president he is running to lead a movement almost like a cult built on this false reality of hope and change. Change only comes over time and only through experience which clearly Obama does not have. The responses that Obama gives at times in regards to his foreign poilcy are downright scary including comments he made in several debates that he has no problem bombing Pakistan without cause. The media really needs to start questioning him hard on comments like this that could possibly lead to world wars and or leave the U.S. utterly defenseless and at the mercy of our adversaries. The media has done a terrible job at this and the democratic primaries continue to be an American Idol contest and not about the serious issues we face in this country.
99.
The King of Meats
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
——————”bombing Pakistan without cause.” That statement is out of context!
——————So, if Hillary is not going to negotiate with enemies, then what does
——————Obama have to lose by trying?
——————While your’re calling everyone naive, you sit there with no
——————rhyme or reason. People are tired of dead, dry leaders!
——————And, I venture to say, you cannot predict how effective Obama will be
——————with America’s adversaries! You sound like George Bush Sr. when
——————Jesse Jackson flew home with the POWs. A great lack of faith!
——————I would rather see Obama wave a magic wand that to see Bush waving
——————the American flag covered with senseless blood stains!
——————Do you remember Martin’s teaching about violence? Just in case you
——————-forgot, here’s a little song we grew up with that I’m sure you know:
——————-”I’m gonna lay down my burdens, down by the riverside…And, I ain’t
——————-gonna study war no more, study war no more, study war no mooore!
——————-Obama talked about Hillary driving the bus in a ditch and the next day
——————-a school but tipped over filled with school children and a driver who had
——————-suppended license. So, maybe words are more powerful than some of
——————-you think! Diplomacy! Negotiate! Reasoning! Reconciliation!
——————-Submission! Obama has a special gift! More so than that Oval office
——————-hanky-panky of the Clintons! Or, the special interest of the Bush’s and
——————-McCains!
100.
flylike
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
Wack Music , seriously are you white? Or you just hate your own black people….all these Kumbaya references are getting played….yall need to stfu with that Bullshit.
101.
Wack Music
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
King of Meats, yeah I lack faith in OBama because OBAMA IS NOT GOD or the 2nd COMING OF CHRIST. Obama is a junior senator from Illinois who hasn’t done anything for Illinois and got lucky. Sorry pure luck and being in the right place at the right time has catapulted him into the national spotlight.
LOL at the fact that you say I lack faith. It just show how cult like Obamaloons are. He is not Christ or a religious leader. He is a politician and the only difference between him and the rest is he can hide it better. If you are really that naive to believe Obama will wave a magic wand over DC and the gates of heaven will open and a chorus of angels will sing and the world will become perfect and at peace then you are just are loony and lost as those scientologist or Jim Jones followers. You guys are not supporters of Obama, you are followers of Obama and that is dangerous. Put your faith in God and not in man. Obama is trying ts trying to become president of America not King of Heaven. Be for real.
History has not taught stupid Americans anything. Clinton while a good president tried negotiating and it didn’t work with N. Korea at all. Do you think Obama is gonna be any better. That he has some magic power that will make Kim Jong II fall to hsi knees and see the error of ways. LOL. Be serrious. Obama is gonna be another Jimmy Carter who was an extreme liberal, charismatic anti-war guy who was a terrible president. Has history not taught you anything. People like Obama and Bush are nothing but extremes of their party. One being an extreme liberal, anti-war, kiss and make up panderer and the other being an extreme neo-conservative, pro-war, aggressive panderer.Bush has caused us to extend our resources and cause some friction with other countries. Obama will probably extend our resources and could cause even further economic turmoil as we potentially head into a recission. He also could leave us utterly defenseless and making the same mistakes we made in the past. He will not usher in a new area in America. He will be the same old same old. Just like Carter. Both Bush and Obama are nothing put extremes of their parties and both lacked experience and a real understanding of how the world works.
The problem is Americans have not yet realized that the president needs to be a moderate like Hillary or McCain and someone with experience. Someone who has a grasp of the issues and real solutions for America but who is also bipartisan and moderate in their views and knows how to compromise. And Meeting with people like Kim Jong II, Pakistan, Iran etc .and negotiating does not work especially without preconditions and a real understanding of the history of these countries and their leaders. Extreme candidates in either party are just bad for America because they do nothing but try and push their agenda.
102.
hilltop
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
Wack Music you sound just like Hillary’s wack ass speech!!!! LMAO!!! Nobody sees Obama as a God!!! Give me a break! Please stop.. you sound ridiculous!!!
103.
jayla06
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
I agree with your post Wack Music……you might as well stop wasting your voice here!
These people are ignorant when it comes to politics lol……I stopped talking awhile ago!
I can’t wait to see Obama go up against Mccain in the primaries……Mccain will eat him alive (just wait)! Tuesday’s debate showed his lack of knowledge when it comes to foreign policy….All he did was agree with Hillary on issues he had no idea about! I’m convinced he had no idea about Dmitry Medvedev and what Putin stands for! He was just as lost as a boy wandering the woods at night!
Stop wasting your voice and wait until the primaries!
104.
flylike
Thursday, February 28, 2008 /
its funny how u ppl claim no one knows anything about politics, when you are dumb enuf to believe Hillary can beat McCain. lol i just laugh at ur stupidity…
i swear wack music is Glenn Beck and Jayla06 dumb ass is Lou Dobbs, stop wasting ur time writing long ass posts, no one gives a fuck! we’ll continue to be “politically ignorant” and support Obama, ok thanks and gooodnite.
105.
Galaxee
Friday, February 29, 2008 /
whooo…im waitin on this outcome..
106.
UMMM NO....
Friday, February 29, 2008 /
..
107.
jayla06
Friday, February 29, 2008 /
FLYLIKE…..Your ignorance goes far beyond politics lol!
Your comments are so asinine and uneducated……not to mention you always seem to go back to your adolescent years with childish name-calling!
Being called a “dumb ass” is a compliment from you….so i’ll take this time to give you an informal “Thanks” lol!
108.
flylike
Friday, February 29, 2008 /
jayla06, i’m alot of things, childish being one of them, Ignorant ? no ill pass on that.you don’t know me so say what u will
i still think you’re a dumbass….majority of you come here giving hypothetical reasons for why not to vote for Obama, oh its a set up , oh its a conspiracy… No black man will ever win…
well I don’t like defeatist theories and the comments on here about kumbaya and magic wand and all that are too cynical and there not even original as they come right out of T.V… i mean seriously, when u start sayin bullshit like that is why i realize im dealing with dumbasses…
You for one have been saying people voting for Obama are ignorant - who are you to tell people their choice is an ignorant one? So i assume Iowa is ignorant, Maryland is Ignorant, Virginia is Ignorant, Wisconsin is Ignorant, Georgia is Ignorant….etc etc etc
Who made you God and Know it all of Politics? You & wack music and others are quite silly to me, i have no problem with u voting for Hillary that’s your prerogative, but when you act like your choice is somehow the smarter more politically educated choice, thats when i tune out. Don’t give me conspiracy theories, tell me why Hillary is more capable or more experienced, show me her credentials, trust me i’ve looked it up and aint shit poppin…
Tell me how exactly, when Hillary and Obama’s plans are almost identical - yet Obamas’ are Unrealistic? Is that Logic?
If you want the real TRUTH, Go to the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS website, look up these people’s records then come back to me. Side by side run down of Hillary and Obama’s record what they have actually done…heres a start , from a completely unbiased MOTHER who refused to buy into Obama’s “Hype”
http://www.dailykos.com/s...2/20/201332/807/36/458633
109.
The King of Meats
Friday, February 29, 2008 /
——————–Music, I never suggested you put your faith in Obama, you should not
——————–put your faith in man, but in God’s ability to bring about a change
——————–through him! Put your faith in God! I’m trying to help those of you
——————–who only see the world in terms of mans plan and design! Get past
——————–that and expect a miracle! You sound like someone who never knew
——————–a blessing! And, stop going off on tangents like Bush looking for
——————–weapons of mass destruction and a 52 deck of cards!! Frenzy!!!
110.
Sarah
Friday, February 29, 2008 /
TO SEE HOW MUCH OF A BOLD FACE LIAR HILLARY IS GOOGLE: HILLARY CLINTON AND FRAUD, AND WATCH THE YOU TUBE VIDEO TITLED “THE SHOCKING VIDEO HILLARY DOES NOT WANT YOUR TO SEE”.
THE VIDEO CONCERNS HILLARY CAMPAIGN FINANCING FRAUD, WITH A MAN NAMED PETER PAUL. THIS CASE IS CURRENTLY IN COURT IN CALIFORNIA. SOMEHOW THE MEDIA HAS DECIDED NOT TO TELL THE TRUTH, AND WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY!!
WE THE PEOPLE NEED TO DO OUR OWN RESEARCH BEFORE WE PUT ANOTHER PATHELOGICAL LIAR LIKE HILLARY, AND HER LYING HUSBAND, AND THE WORST LYING PRESIDENT TO DATE, BILL CLINTON, BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
THE YOUTUBE VIDEO IS A MUST SEE: IT’S CALLED –”THE SHOCKING VIDEO HILLARY CLINTON DOES NOT WANT YOU TO SEE”, STARRING PETER PAUL WHO DID THE ILLEGAL FUNDRASING FOR HER.
HILLARY CLINTON’S, CROOK ACCOMPLICE OF A HUSBAND, BILL CLINTON HAS THE NERVE TO BE ADVOCATING IN A SPEECH TODAY FOR HIS CROOKED WIFE TO GET BACK INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.
DO WE REALLY WANT ADMITTED LIARS, AND CROOKS RUNNING OUR GOVERNMENT.
HILLARY WILL NOT WIN AGAINST JOHN McCAIN, IF SHE GETS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION, SHE WILL HIT IN THE FACE WITH ALL THE LIES, AND FRAUDS SHE HAS COMMITTED, AND THE COURT CASE SHE IS INVOLVED IN, IN CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD. THERE IS VIDEO TAPE EVIDENCE, SEE THE YOUTUBE VIDEO, OF HER COMMITING THIS FRAUD. SHE WILL LIKELY BE PROSECUTED FOR IT, SHE WILL NOT BE PRESIDENT.
111.
Sarah
Saturday, March 1, 2008 /
HILLARY CLINTON IS A BOLD FACE LIAR!!
WATCH THE YOUTUBE VIDEO TITLED: “THE SHOCKING VIDEO HILLARY DOES NOT WANT YOUR TO SEE”.
THE VIDEO CONCERNS HILLARY CAMPAIGN FINANCING FRAUD, WITH A MAN NAMED PETER PAUL. THIS CASE IS CURRENTLY IN COURT IN CALIFORNIA. SOMEHOW THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA HAS DECIDED NOT TO TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON!! Hillary Clinton is facing a Campaign Finance Fraud case in court in California. Apparently she had a man named Peter Paul do a fund raising event for her U.S. Senator election campaign, raising $1.2 million dollars for her. After it was revealed that Peter Paul had a criminal background, Hillary lied about knowing him, or receiving $1.2 millions in campaign financing from him. She also filed documents with the FEC, and did not report the $1.2 million dollars she had received from the campaign fundraiser, WHICH IS A FELONY.
VIDEO evidence, and PHONE CALL evidence, and LETTERS evidence (as seen in the youtube video) is going to be presented in court in California in his lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, and she will most likely be charged with a felony.
The mainstream press has for some reason been ignoring this story fact, but it is for us to search out the truth.
It is imparitive that people know this information before they vote, because Hillary, with yet another fraud case pending, where there is physical proof of her participatig in the fraud, on video tape, will NOT become president, and will be prosecuted!
Democrats need to know the facts so they don’t waste their votes on this dishonest woman who will not make it to the White House. This information is in the public domain, and the courts, and the Republicans will surely use it during the general election.
WE DO NOT WANT TO PUT ANOTHER PATHELOGICAL LIAR LIKE HILLARY, AND HER ACCOMPLICE, HER LYING HUSBAND, THE WORST LYING PRESIDENT TO DATE, BILL CLINTON, BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
THE YOUTUBE VIDEO IS A MUST SEE: IT’S CALLED –”THE SHOCKING VIDEO HILLARY CLINTON DOES NOT WANT YOU TO SEE”,
DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME OR VOTE ON THIS DISGRACEFUL WOMAN, VOTE FOR SOMEONE WITH INTEGRITY.
COMMENT PAGES: « 1 [2] Show All