Sean “Diddy” Combs covers the October issue of L’Uomo Vogue’s Music Issue and the music mogul recently celebrated this by throwing an exclusive party in NYC earlier this week.. Here are a few other shots from the issue featuring Diddy and his twin daughters D’Lila Star and Jesse James.
In the issue, Diddy talks about the upcoming presidential election, the importance of voting, his many successful businesses and the evolution of inspiration in creating music. Famed photographer, Mark Seliger, shot him in a variety of styles from a variety of designers including Tom Ford, Roberto Cavalli, Michael Kors, Ralph Lauren Black Label and Sean John, among others.
why those babies have no clothes on?
The twins are absolutely beautiful. I love them.
i love those little babies
i just wish they could of gotten a little tankie or something
I think Diddy is SUPER sexy WITH his shades on. Without them he looks very unnatractive. All he needs is a little surgery to staple those shades in his head. Him and Jay-Z need to switch roles. Because we all know Jay will be wearing shades in the darkest of nights.
His girls are adorable.
@1 i was thinking the same thing……..i dont know why people automatically assume the “baby in a pamper” is the cutest thing you can do…
His girls are cute… but they should have some clothes hes literally expoliting them…
The girls are too cute !
It is to many pervs out there now at days for them to be topless, it is not like back in the day.
Diddy these are girls they need tops on
awww they are precious
the shots are wonderful. wonder who the photographer was. also.. yes at #1 where the heck are the twins clothes. i don’t get it.. (not hatin but) what was the statement being made? that girls could look like boys? as a visual artist, in photography, we must think of what the image is trying to convey to the viewer…
in other words.. they are little girls. don’t put a bow around their necks! They kinda look like little cute chip n dales.. not cool. They still are adorable tho ..lol but if Diddy can be dressed up, so can his little girls, right?
Oh.. didn’t see that.. Mark Seliger part.. Excellent job MARK!
Yeah, you all are right but if you think about it, all those baby pampers and some pull-ups have the children the same way. So….
But there are a lot of pervs out there so the clothes could have been a great idea. I think it is cute though, with the little bowties on. It’s adorable.
I don’t care what kind of statement they are trying to make, Puffy and Kim should know betta to do that crazy shyt. Yes the girls are absolutely beautiful,but with no clothes on, that shyt don’t look right. All these pervs out here and u gonna let ur girls go naked. It’s not like they’re newborns or under 6 months old, these children r almost 2 years old. To be different is good, but when u go to the extreme, it’s crazy.
naked babies in an adult mag .. not cute
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM naked babies and why are they wearing bow ties
I dont like these picturee I know they are suppose to be couture or whatever… those are girls not boys they shouldve at least put a diaper on them… sorry yalll I dont like the photo at all
How ridiculous can u get Puffy and Kim? what are you trying to prove? evidently not a dayum thing. Both of u know those beautiful babies need some clothes on. A perv could be anyone, even the bodyguard who just haven’t gotten caught yet. Those aren’t newborns, they’re almost two years old, what are they thinking? really……..
Oh yea!!!! I know R Kelly done bought his copy or two…….that’s not meant to be funny or cute.
I see Diddy is continuing on his publicity kick (i.e. Danity Kane’s bullshyt breakup). One thing I can say about this man is that he know’s how to make his money and keep his name in everybody’s mouth! So I was not surprised to see his beautiful baby girls photographed without clothes on. If they had clothes on…then the picture just would have been ordinary…which we all know ain’t Puff’s style!
This is very disturbing to see naked picture of children being exploited to this level. Diddy truly needs some help. I am very disgusted by this. Where was Kim Porter when all this was going on?
those babies are adorable!! stop with the hatin’ please!!!!
those little girls are beautiful.
I am not hating and there’s nothing adorable about seeing naked pictures of babies!!
P Diddy…the girls are too cute, but their PICTURE is Out of Order!!!!!
Please give the girls a chance to grow-up. Let them decide what they would like to show the WORLD………..PLEASE!!!
Naked baby pics are for the baby book in mom and dads collection of photos. This shit right here is just dumb as hell, but they aint (yeah aint) my damn kids.
The baby girls are really cute. I can’t help wondering how his other little girls’ mother feels about him always displaying his affection for the twins and never for her daughter. Maybe she wants it that way. I dont know…
I have yet to hear him or read about him acknowledging the other baby girl in an interview. Maybe he did and I miss it.
@ #20 aka QUEEN TEE
Oh please!!!! aint nobody disputing that there not cute all were saying is that the picture is very inappropriate for an adult magazine NOBODY i repeat NOBODY is hating… so just cut it out.
hmmm looks like that is what goes on at home babies playing in stuff.. Daddy’s tie, mommy’s make-up I get the concept… and no it’s no different then the Pamper commercials…
Yes it would have been ordinary had they had on clothes…
Diddy isn’t oridinary and neither are his kids… his kids who am I to judge… had it been a more natural setting like them playing I suppose it wouldn’t have been so offensive to some but them just sitting somewhat posing causes the stir…
They are beautiful. But they need sum clothes on. And the bow tie there not playboy bunnys.
the twins are so adorable!But why are they naked?It seems like they are exploiting the kids.They would be as adorable with clothes on but cute pics!
I feel that celebrities should Keep their families seperate from the spotlight. That stunt he pulled w/ the girls is just wrong, HE likes attention! Don’t subject your girls 2 your bullshit DIDDY, you went 2 far this tyme!!!
His daughters are adorable, but with all the michael jacksons and r kellys of the world lurking around, he should be far mroe protective of his daughters.
Whoring himself around for money is one thing, but dont do that to your own children, they deserve better. Whats diddy gonna say when those girls are 18 and playboy asks them to do a spread (excuse the pun), he wont really be able to say anything cus he’s whored them out since birth
Diddy needs to go to the Denzel school of parenting
Ok, I’m mad at that twin pics!! Those are some weird looking little girls..NOT CUTE ALL.. Sarah’s ( the light-skin baby mama) daughter is way much more cuter than these lil butter balls..And why are they naked!!?? NOT A GOOD LOOK
Diddy u are doing ur daughters a disservice by having them nude in an adult mag. The children are beautiful. You should’ve requested that they be dressed in a nude color onesie or something. Not to mention the bowtie screams playboy!
These pictures are highly inappropriate. These girls are too old for public naked shots.
Once again, Diddy comes off like an attention-seeking, media-hungry, will-do-anything-to-be-in-a-picture so-called mogul.
That’s a weird ass picture of those babies, if they were boys then I could maybe the logic behind giving them ties on- that’s sick damn!
diddy’s twins are so cute.they look like little sumo wrestlers.diddy looks dapper as usual.
Urrrm… i don’t think i’ll be buying that.
yeah….. that whole “naked baby” concept would have been amazing and super cute if those girls were BABIES!!!!…. They are too old to be naked in some photographs!!! Once a child can walk and talk… that’s it…. They probably like dang we all naked and ish…. They are very adorable nonetheless….
The director of that shoot needs to be fired tho….. they could have dressed them up in extravagant fancy dresses….the works… like pearls, fur boas, and hats… kinda like little women… I think that would have been a he!! of a lot better…
imo
@ #1, That’s exactly what I was thinking. They are at the age where baby in the buff is in poor taste. That is only for newborns. He could have at least let them wear a black diaper cover to blend in instead. But those are some beautiful girls.
I think Diddy and kim must have forgotten for a moment that they had twin girls not twin boys. They could have put the girls in cute dresses matching the colours puffy has on that would look better than wearing nothing.
Nice pics but y the twins dont have any clothes on then their girls that makes it worst.
These shots are beautiful, Diddy looks very sophisticated and suave, love it! The nekkid little girls threw me off a bit…I assume it is supposed to be artisitc…but still…
i love the baby girls! but them naked in drag isn’t a good look for them. they’re way cuter than how they’re photographed in the mag!
The girls are adorable, there’s no disputing that…BUT they arent exactly babies anymore ..so put some damn clothes on the children!!!!
they need clothes
Those are little girls and I don’t think the picture is appropiate for little girls.
why are the babies w/o clothes? look, that’s real cute when its in your personal photo album, not so much when its in a dayum men’s magazine!!!! pedos get off on *ish like this. Diddy is a moron and Kim is a bigger one for lettin her girls be used.
i think the girls could have some type of pretty pamper or something on, but you people are tripping
there are proud fathers out there who read vogue, not everyone is some perve trying to look at a naked baby, yall really are ruining the innocence of didy’s kids, they aren’t doing anymore than the gerber baby or the babies in diaper commercials, they all are naked! yall act like they are in school now or something
THOSE BABIES ARE SOOO BEAUTIFUL! U DUMMIES NEED TO STOP HATING AND GET YALL DAMN HEADS OUTTA THE GUTTER! LAMES DUCKS!
angel im guessing you mean BLAC label.
but none the less. my dude DIDDY stay making moves. ENYCE on the portfolio now.
HOW INTERESTING , THOES GIRL’S LOOK Like Dad .
@31 Thank you , He’s such a fool .
Whoring himself around for money is one thing, but dont do that to your own children, they deserve better. Whats diddy gonna say when those girls are 18 and playboy asks them to do a spread (excuse the pun), he wont really be able to say anything cus he’s whored them out since birth
Diddy needs to go to the Denzel school of parenting
im sorry but he just made his kids look real stupid
dont you just luv when somebody has a different opinion some knucklehead goes oh u hatin’. naw, that means the other party ain’t buyin’ into the BS. I say, ho-ing out your kids is wrong and that’s my opinion, no hating involved. In a fisher price world ain’t no pedos or Jackos but in the reality that I reside in, they exist. The girls are approaching 2, not exactly babies but toddlers and they shouldn’t be naked in a mens magazine. again, my opinion.
The babies being naked did catch me off guard too! However, folks these are babies! There’s not a damn thing to lust after. Plenty of women pose w/ naked babies all the time. Its not a big deal, its art. So please take the stick outta ya @ss
This is an adult mag. Those kids should absolutely have had some clothes on. A pampers commerical is different. This is not a pampers commerical . Diddy is posing sexy with naked girls (his babies ) around him. Just sick!
WHY OH WHY did DIDDY do that to those beautiful girls….. I mean come on…. They are lovely but htey needed a lil more than a BOW KISS ME TAIL TIE…. I am truly astonished….. NO IM NOT im DISGUSTED…… He wrong for dat right there….
Isnt this considered like child porn?
ya’ll are killing me comparing this bullshit to the diaper commercials…those babies in those commercials would just be wearing diapers since thats the focal point of the commercial!!!!
truth of the matter is,this is not cute.they could have put those babies on t-shirts or something!
THE TWINS R BEAUTIFUL BUT WERE R THE CLOTHES
I am a diddy fan but i do not agree with him putting his daughters out there partially nude… i undersand “high fashion” and “art” but there are crazies out there diddy…