why those babies have no clothes on?

The twins are absolutely beautiful. I love them.

i love those little babies
i just wish they could of gotten a little tankie or something

I think Diddy is SUPER sexy WITH his shades on. Without them he looks very unnatractive. All he needs is a little surgery to staple those shades in his head. Him and Jay-Z need to switch roles. Because we all know Jay will be wearing shades in the darkest of nights.

His girls are adorable.

@1 i was thinking the same thing……..i dont know why people automatically assume the “baby in a pamper” is the cutest thing you can do…

His girls are cute… but they should have some clothes hes literally expoliting them…

The girls are too cute !

It is to many pervs out there now at days for them to be topless, it is not like back in the day.

Diddy these are girls they need tops on

awww they are precious

the shots are wonderful. wonder who the photographer was. also.. yes at #1 where the heck are the twins clothes. i don’t get it.. (not hatin but) what was the statement being made? that girls could look like boys? as a visual artist, in photography, we must think of what the image is trying to convey to the viewer…

in other words.. they are little girls. don’t put a bow around their necks! They kinda look like little cute chip n dales.. not cool. They still are adorable tho ..lol but if Diddy can be dressed up, so can his little girls, right?

Oh.. didn’t see that.. Mark Seliger part.. Excellent job MARK!

Yeah, you all are right but if you think about it, all those baby pampers and some pull-ups have the children the same way. So….

But there are a lot of pervs out there so the clothes could have been a great idea. I think it is cute though, with the little bowties on. It’s adorable.

I don’t care what kind of statement they are trying to make, Puffy and Kim should know betta to do that crazy shyt. Yes the girls are absolutely beautiful,but with no clothes on, that shyt don’t look right. All these pervs out here and u gonna let ur girls go naked. It’s not like they’re newborns or under 6 months old, these children r almost 2 years old. To be different is good, but when u go to the extreme, it’s crazy.

naked babies in an adult mag .. not cute

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM naked babies and why are they wearing bow ties

I dont like these picturee I know they are suppose to be couture or whatever… those are girls not boys they shouldve at least put a diaper on them… sorry yalll I dont like the photo at all

How ridiculous can u get Puffy and Kim? what are you trying to prove? evidently not a dayum thing. Both of u know those beautiful babies need some clothes on. A perv could be anyone, even the bodyguard who just haven’t gotten caught yet. Those aren’t newborns, they’re almost two years old, what are they thinking? really……..

Oh yea!!!! I know R Kelly done bought his copy or two…….that’s not meant to be funny or cute.

I see Diddy is continuing on his publicity kick (i.e. Danity Kane’s bullshyt breakup). One thing I can say about this man is that he know’s how to make his money and keep his name in everybody’s mouth! So I was not surprised to see his beautiful baby girls photographed without clothes on. If they had clothes on…then the picture just would have been ordinary…which we all know ain’t Puff’s style!

This is very disturbing to see naked picture of children being exploited to this level. Diddy truly needs some help. I am very disgusted by this. Where was Kim Porter when all this was going on?

those babies are adorable!! stop with the hatin’ please!!!!

those little girls are beautiful.

I am not hating and there’s nothing adorable about seeing naked pictures of babies!!

P Diddy…the girls are too cute, but their PICTURE is Out of Order!!!!!

Please give the girls a chance to grow-up. Let them decide what they would like to show the WORLD………..PLEASE!!!

Naked baby pics are for the baby book in mom and dads collection of photos. This shit right here is just dumb as hell, but they aint (yeah aint) my damn kids.

The baby girls are really cute. I can’t help wondering how his other little girls’ mother feels about him always displaying his affection for the twins and never for her daughter. Maybe she wants it that way. I dont know…
I have yet to hear him or read about him acknowledging the other baby girl in an interview. Maybe he did and I miss it.

@ #20 aka QUEEN TEE

Oh please!!!! aint nobody disputing that there not cute all were saying is that the picture is very inappropriate for an adult magazine NOBODY i repeat NOBODY is hating… so just cut it out.

hmmm looks like that is what goes on at home babies playing in stuff.. Daddy’s tie, mommy’s make-up I get the concept… and no it’s no different then the Pamper commercials…

Yes it would have been ordinary had they had on clothes…

Diddy isn’t oridinary and neither are his kids… his kids who am I to judge… had it been a more natural setting like them playing I suppose it wouldn’t have been so offensive to some but them just sitting somewhat posing causes the stir…

They are beautiful. But they need sum clothes on. And the bow tie there not playboy bunnys.

the twins are so adorable!But why are they naked?It seems like they are exploiting the kids.They would be as adorable with clothes on but cute pics!

I feel that celebrities should Keep their families seperate from the spotlight. That stunt he pulled w/ the girls is just wrong, HE likes attention! Don’t subject your girls 2 your bullshit DIDDY, you went 2 far this tyme!!!

His daughters are adorable, but with all the michael jacksons and r kellys of the world lurking around, he should be far mroe protective of his daughters.

Whoring himself around for money is one thing, but dont do that to your own children, they deserve better. Whats diddy gonna say when those girls are 18 and playboy asks them to do a spread (excuse the pun), he wont really be able to say anything cus he’s whored them out since birth

Diddy needs to go to the Denzel school of parenting

Ok, I’m mad at that twin pics!! Those are some weird looking little girls..NOT CUTE ALL.. Sarah’s ( the light-skin baby mama) daughter is way much more cuter than these lil butter balls..And why are they naked!!?? NOT A GOOD LOOK

Diddy u are doing ur daughters a disservice by having them nude in an adult mag. The children are beautiful. You should’ve requested that they be dressed in a nude color onesie or something. Not to mention the bowtie screams playboy!
These pictures are highly inappropriate. These girls are too old for public naked shots.
Once again, Diddy comes off like an attention-seeking, media-hungry, will-do-anything-to-be-in-a-picture so-called mogul.

That’s a weird ass picture of those babies, if they were boys then I could maybe the logic behind giving them ties on- that’s sick damn!

diddy’s twins are so cute.they look like little sumo wrestlers.diddy looks dapper as usual.

Urrrm… i don’t think i’ll be buying that.

yeah….. that whole “naked baby” concept would have been amazing and super cute if those girls were BABIES!!!!…. They are too old to be naked in some photographs!!! Once a child can walk and talk… that’s it…. They probably like dang we all naked and ish…. They are very adorable nonetheless….

The director of that shoot needs to be fired tho….. they could have dressed them up in extravagant fancy dresses….the works… like pearls, fur boas, and hats… kinda like little women… I think that would have been a he!! of a lot better…

imo

@ #1, That’s exactly what I was thinking. They are at the age where baby in the buff is in poor taste. That is only for newborns. He could have at least let them wear a black diaper cover to blend in instead. But those are some beautiful girls.

I think Diddy and kim must have forgotten for a moment that they had twin girls not twin boys. They could have put the girls in cute dresses matching the colours puffy has on that would look better than wearing nothing.

Nice pics but y the twins dont have any clothes on then their girls that makes it worst.

These shots are beautiful, Diddy looks very sophisticated and suave, love it! The nekkid little girls threw me off a bit…I assume it is supposed to be artisitc…but still…

i love the baby girls! but them naked in drag isn’t a good look for them. they’re way cuter than how they’re photographed in the mag!

The girls are adorable, there’s no disputing that…BUT they arent exactly babies anymore ..so put some damn clothes on the children!!!!

they need clothes

Those are little girls and I don’t think the picture is appropiate for little girls.

why are the babies w/o clothes? look, that’s real cute when its in your personal photo album, not so much when its in a dayum men’s magazine!!!! pedos get off on *ish like this. Diddy is a moron and Kim is a bigger one for lettin her girls be used.

i think the girls could have some type of pretty pamper or something on, but you people are tripping

there are proud fathers out there who read vogue, not everyone is some perve trying to look at a naked baby, yall really are ruining the innocence of didy’s kids, they aren’t doing anymore than the gerber baby or the babies in diaper commercials, they all are naked! yall act like they are in school now or something

THOSE BABIES ARE SOOO BEAUTIFUL! U DUMMIES NEED TO STOP HATING AND GET YALL DAMN HEADS OUTTA THE GUTTER! LAMES DUCKS!

angel im guessing you mean BLAC label.
but none the less. my dude DIDDY stay making moves. ENYCE on the portfolio now.

HOW INTERESTING , THOES GIRL’S LOOK Like Dad .

@31 Thank you , He’s such a fool .

Whoring himself around for money is one thing, but dont do that to your own children, they deserve better. Whats diddy gonna say when those girls are 18 and playboy asks them to do a spread (excuse the pun), he wont really be able to say anything cus he’s whored them out since birth

Diddy needs to go to the Denzel school of parenting

im sorry but he just made his kids look real stupid

dont you just luv when somebody has a different opinion some knucklehead goes oh u hatin’. naw, that means the other party ain’t buyin’ into the BS. I say, ho-ing out your kids is wrong and that’s my opinion, no hating involved. In a fisher price world ain’t no pedos or Jackos but in the reality that I reside in, they exist. The girls are approaching 2, not exactly babies but toddlers and they shouldn’t be naked in a mens magazine. again, my opinion.

The babies being naked did catch me off guard too! However, folks these are babies! There’s not a damn thing to lust after. Plenty of women pose w/ naked babies all the time. Its not a big deal, its art. So please take the stick outta ya @ss

This is an adult mag. Those kids should absolutely have had some clothes on. A pampers commerical is different. This is not a pampers commerical . Diddy is posing sexy with naked girls (his babies ) around him. Just sick!

WHY OH WHY did DIDDY do that to those beautiful girls….. I mean come on…. They are lovely but htey needed a lil more than a BOW KISS ME TAIL TIE…. I am truly astonished….. NO IM NOT im DISGUSTED…… He wrong for dat right there….

Isnt this considered like child porn?

ya’ll are killing me comparing this bullshit to the diaper commercials…those babies in those commercials would just be wearing diapers since thats the focal point of the commercial!!!!

truth of the matter is,this is not cute.they could have put those babies on t-shirts or something!

THE TWINS R BEAUTIFUL BUT WERE R THE CLOTHES

I am a diddy fan but i do not agree with him putting his daughters out there partially nude… i undersand “high fashion” and “art” but there are crazies out there diddy…

Uhmmm. were’s the illegitimate one? Why is he acting like he only has two daughters. more importantly—- where’s their clothes?

tem girls look like some boys he need another hairstylist for them and y they naked

I’m sorry, but this is not cute at all. Since Diddy is clearly going for the dapper look, why couldn’t they find some really fashionable dresses for the girls? This is just wrong and looks twisted on so many levels. I wouldn’t even want the photographer to see my naked baby. Especially in this day and age. And I don’t wanna hear any nonsense about this being art either. It’s not art, it’s exploitation at it’s finest and Diddy needs to be ashamed of himself. And if Kim co-signed on this….then shame on her too.

Ummm…..yea…..no freakin comment! Next!

being a mother i think i can speak for MOST mothers and say…Those are girl children!…He should have had a lil top on them or something..didn’t he fire Aubrey becoz of her lifetsyle of exposure?….and she’s a grown woman!…he always prides himself on being an exceptional father yet…we see pictures of his girl children exposed….They’re beautiful, yes…exposed in pictures on the wall of THEIR bedroom is one thing…but to the world?…with all of those sick sexual predators out there?…come on you know they’re gonna pass those pics around,dang …what were YOU thinking?….oh.. but wait……. that’s business..,,,right?..*smh*…ya outswaved yaself this time DADDY, I mean DIDDY!

He’s a money grubbing scandelous ass hole and Im not surprised that he is exploiting his daughters. He probably have their career all outlined for them and Im sure being scandelous is a part of the plan for them too. He the type of nigga that would have his teenaged daughter fuck for tracks. I don’t trust him. Nothing about him is good. Yeah he make ppl laugh with his antics and youtube but he’s a snake in the grass and the only reason he get all these accolades is becuz he got money and sucked a few dicks himself. His lil girls and all his children are adorable but their daddy ain’t shit…and they’ll soon find that out one day too. I’m not impressed with his spread in vogue…so what?? I rather see a up and coming black model in the spread than Diddy’s tacky Negroid ass. This isn’t hate, i just hate snake ass ppl period.

Diddy need to give it up, mainstream don’t see him as A list, so stop parading these babies around, nobody cares but his fans. They will never offer him 2 cents for pics, so quit it.

The babies are real cuties though.

By the way, why has to wonder why he’s claiming these kids and running around with them, but you don’t see pics of him with the baby he had with Sarah…..what makes these babies legitimate and her baby not, he wasn’t married to any of their mothers….

Diddy is a trip and a hoe.

those shots r beautful!!!

Sorry…his daughters are not cute to me.

#47 and 48:

That aint no pampers or gerber ad…..
and if you look at those ads…. they are babies!!!!!!!!…. not toddlers… That makes a huge difference!!!

it’s just [socially] inappropriate!

They are babies, girls or boys it does’t matter we see babies in diapers and nothing else all the time. Without knowing their names, I couldn’t tell if they were boys or girls! The fact that some of the bloggers made an issue of it tells me how jaded and twisted your way of thinking may be! There is no comparison between slutty Aubry O’Day and these shots of babies that are not even two years old!

Those girls are cutie patooties!!! They look so much like Diddy its ridiculous! Nice picks Diddy!!

Was it intentional or just sort of happen that the baby hand is between the other baby leg? that pic should be pulled, it may be innocent but you know!

OK WHY ARE PPL SO CAUGHT UP ON THE FACT THAT THE TWINS ARE NAKED… THEIR BABIES FOR GOODNESS SAKE GET OVER IT CUZ I KNOW SOME OF YALL HAVE PICS OF UR KIDS IN THE BATH TUB… GET OVER IT ALREADY THERE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO TALK ABOUT!

man… yall be fontin like you dont have any nude pictures taken at that age. these are just hist babygirls.. being black and… beautiful!!! people keep forgetting that these girls are still so young and little, an with that being nude is nothing to be ashamed of.. its just childrenworld. they dont need and dont think about having -highfashion clothes or shit if they would, som of you haters then would say why they’re already dressing up little children. dont make a problem out of something so small…

there will always be disturbed and misguided people that seek something pleasure in little children, wearing clothes or not! just dont act like its a big deal. these are very nice pictures and yall know that if these were your baby-photos yall would be showing them around saying how cute u were as a baby

I DONT UNDERSTAND THE TWINS BEING NAKED….HUMM BUT UMM WOW THEY LOOK JUST LIKE THEIR DADDY AND I DONT FIND DIDDY TO BE ALL THAT “KUTE” OR ATTRACTiVE….

why do they have bow ties on. thats some male crap all the way. they coulda put pink bows in the lil girls hair. anything 2 make a buck, even if that means having yo kids looking like fools

And the pimping begins!!!

I always fought for how Kim Porter chose to live her life with Diddy. But this is too much. Kim, how did this happen? Your girls are too big to go topless and show one girl with her hand between the other girl’s legs.

Kim, you are a classless punk!

Where is Diddy’s mama? Oh, spending Diddy’s money.

The babies are cuties! I’m not going to lie, the nekkidness did throw me off…with the bowties look like little Playboy bunnies… Maybe if they had on a pamper…

They r gorgeous!
But he could at least put some clothes on them.
He know damn well wen they get older they gon look at this n be mad lol

Poor taste . Diddy needs to grow up. Why portray his baby girls like this.Nasty

Why are his daughters titties out in the bare open ….wit bow ties????

The pics would be cute if the nekkidness wasn’t so damn awkward. Thumbs down to you Diddy.

SAD.,SAD SEAN DO YOU HAVE A BRAIN THAT FUNCTIONS, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING CONSULT WITH OPRAH BEFORE YOU MAKE DECISIONS WITHIN THIS CAPACITY, BECAUSE YOUR MAMA AND YOUR BABYS MAMA HAVE NO TACT.

Eww. This pic is a hot ass mess. Little 2 year olds posing with out clothes in a magazine is ridiculous… Plus Kim feeds them too much. Diddy looks good though. LMAO

Naked babies in a men’s magazine or in a babies mag is not cute either way. The girls are really cute, so I’m not taking that away from them. They’re adorable but I just feel uneasy about Diddy having clothes on and most of all, his girls being naked in a magazine being published all over the world. Hopefully they wont do this again. I would like to think Kim didn’t know anything about this and maybe Diddy made this decision at the last minute without her. All in all, I feel uneasy about the pic. They’re cute girls why exploit them. Makin it even worse by adding bowties. LIke someone else said, its too much like chip n dales.

Lovely babies, I like diddy, but honestly i just dont feel good about them being naked, where are the diaper/pull-ups?
I am not worried about their top, its the bottom. they should have put diapers on them….whats the reason for them being naked anyway?

oh god those twins are hideous…

The twins are so adorable. But damn me having a daughter myself, those girls should have some damn clothes on for these public pics. There are too many sick people out there. Putting his little girls out there on Front Street like that was not a good move. Where the hell was Kim ?? I wonder what she thinks !

don’t let rkelly see these

Why the FUCK these little GIRLS dont have no clothes on? These are little girls what the FUCK was going through Diddy’s head. Keep these pictures away from
R. Kelly and other GROWN ass men that like looking at little girls.

Put some clothes on them babies- immediately!!!!!!

The sins of the father will be passed down to his seeds.

Inappropriate.

Awwww they are just babies. Everybody is being very critical. Most mothers have naked pics of their babies when they were in the tub or running around the house. I think it is innocent.

Umm….yeah…Imma need for his big girls to have on clothes! Kiddie +o*n is not cute! PLEASE PULL THIS PICTURE!!!! SMH@ DIDDY….you know better than that…need yo azz kicked for this one…..

Regardless of how much time has passed, I believe this is last visual image that the public will have of Diddy and the twins.

I’m glad that many people see the same thing! Whether y’all wanna admit it or not, sex has taken over the world and it is absolutely disgusting. Coture and Vogue magazines originated from Europe and people over there are obsessed with women and sex. Nude is everywhere on TV and they don’t see anything wrong with it! I’ve always found nude babies on TV and on greeting cards absolutely disturbing and disgusting! Why in the world would anyone wanna see a nude baby. People think that because it’s a new born, it’s okay for it to be nude but I think it’s gross. Diddy should have known better and should be ashamed of himself. Just about everyone in America thought it was disturbing to see Miley Cyrus nude while the Europeans thought we were crazy for bashing her for posing naked in a sheet. There’s a lot of sick, sick, sick people in the… especially in fashion and photography and it’s a shame.

I sure hope R. Kelly doesn’t frequent this site

UMMM… OKAy… they need clothes. There’s no need to make the babies naked. Whut’s the point !

P. Diddy and Kim need to have their Parenting Skills checked. Exploiting their daughters on a magazine. Are they that desperate for money? Just maybe they thrive for attention. They need to be reported to BCW. Lil Chance mom need to keep her far away from P.Diddy and Kim. Somebody need to have class. The pictures are downright low class and sick. However the lil girls will always be the center of attraction. Awe they just too cute.

Sean Combs and Kim Porter’s babies are absolutely beautiful ! !

cute. them girls are adorable. i know they were freezing tho LOL

Dang they look just like Kim. But they could’ve made the pic a bit more tasteful by putting them in some kind of cover up. And they probably caught colds!

Ya’ll are taking this way too far. I think it is cute…Don’t ya’ll see Pampers commercials with little girl without tops on and just Pampers…WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL…BTW I have a little girl and we take pics of her with her top off and no one cares…this was done tastefully in my opinion…

THOSE BABIES ARE SOOOO CUTE!!!

What is a professional opinion?

The photo with the twin girls is not good for a magazine, for the home maybe but not for public viewing. It is poor choice on the photographers part as well as Diddy. He’s too overzealous. He advertises women together and other obscene material in his other ads and videos, as a parent his babies should be exempt. These baby girls shouldn’t be subject to his poor taste in certain material. Sadly they are to young to have a choice.

I understand the point he is trying to make as far as the bowties but they are not boys. A white tuxedo top with the bowtie would worked too.

why di pickney dem nakid wey yuh a try

Fi somebody weh have money yu couldnt buy two likkle tops good god man

Some people think that posting naked photos of their children is fine because their body isn’t fully developed. But what those people forget is that they are magnetizing pedophiles and creating potential harm for their household. I know that people that post their child’s nudity ignore this reality, but the truth is that there’s nothing cuddly and cute about your naked baby in the eyes of a pedophile - it’s totally a turn on.

Mr. Combs has just made an absolute mistake. He has brought trouble into his household. He has automatically attracted unfathomable problems. You see, the society that we live in people are very sexual and he has presented his daughters in a sexual manner (exposed). No matter how you look at the initial motive, the indecency of it all takes away from the point.

Here’s one problem dad created down the road:

If his daughters become celebrities then their fans may be the same strangers whose first association was seeing them naked. These strangers can be pedophiles, etc. These strangers can be (sexually) hungry for his daughters… Now, I know he hires men to protect him, but the amount of fans outnumber his men. And a handful of fans are nuts most of the time.

I would say that he’s definitely presented them sexually, jokingly (bow tie around the neck) and stereotypically (most African American woman are always sexually viewed). This is not the typical father-daughter showcase for magazines. A lot of white celebrities hide their children’s nudity when they opt to take (nudity) photos for magazines.

Whether I’m right or wrong Mr. Combs has more negative effects than positive effects.

Kim will not speak up about this…but she could have at least put a phucking pink bow tie on thiem…1.) they look like they can pass for boy or girl and 2.) the one of the right looks uncomfortable and bored. Anyway, where the hell was Kim? I know she’s scared of Mr. Combs because in the past he has hit her plenty times. There have been plenty domestic issues. So, of course, even if she see’s it’s “odd” she’s not going to speak up about this issue.

Someone needs to speak for those cute babies who are being exploited, these kids needed some clothes on Sean should be sued.

Don’t trust kim, diddy or mama combs to protect these children. Please call the magazine and protest this issue:

L’UOMO Vogue
6520 Telegraph Rd
Bloomfield , MI 48301 USA

t: 248.855.7788
f: 248.855.9495

Check this out!

Diddy Pays Homage to Frank Sinatra in his New Ciroc Vodka Campaign!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ae6a9Az44

This is NOT innocent. It’s exploitation. If this was a regular Joe doing this, those babies would be taken away by CPS. What is up with this?? It is NOT right.

[...] out more pics from the spread over @ Angel’s crib. [...]